School Report Card School Report Card : Minnesota Department of Education


Principal: DEREK BERG

820 MANNING AVE N
LAKE ELMO,  MN  55042
Phone: 651-351-8500
OAK-LAND JUNIOR HIGH (048)

Growing Toward Success - Minnesota's Growth Model


As part of Minnesota's assessment system, The Minnesota Department of Education measures whether or not students are meeting the state math and reading academic standards, which are what they should know and be able to do in a particular grade.

If a student meets those standards, they are considered to be proficient.

With input from educators, the Minnesota Department of Education has created a growth model. The growth model is designed to help parents and educators to track students' progress toward proficiency from year-to-year, in order to better determine whether they are gaining and maintaining skills necessary to be successful after high school.

The growth model chart below identifies the percent of students in your district who were proficient in 2008. The individual boxes show how all students progressed during the 2008-09 school year towards knowing and understanding the content of academic standards at their grade level.


  • Proficient but made low growth
  • Proficient and continued to grow
  • Proficient and made exceptional growth
  • Not proficient and made low growth toward proficiency
  • Not proficient but made some growth toward proficiency
  • Not proficient but made exceptional growth toward proficiency


Math

  Growth Over the 2008-09 School Year
2008 Status Low Medium High
Proficient
27%

165 students were proficient but made low growth


33%

204 students continued to grow

20%

122 students made exceptional growth

Not Proficient
6%

34 students were not proficient and made low growth

7%

41 students were not proficient but made some growth

8%

50 students were not proficient but made exceptional growth


View Math by Grade Level           View Math by Subgroup           View State Growth

Reading

  Growth Over the 2008-09 School Year
2008 Status Low Medium High
Proficient
22%

133 students were proficient but made low growth


29%

178 students continued to grow

33%

205 students made exceptional growth

Not Proficient
5%

30 students were not proficient and made low growth

6%

38 students were not proficient but made some growth

5%

30 students were not proficient but made exceptional growth


View Reading by Grade Level           View Reading by Subgroup           View State Growth