The 2004 reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) included a requirement that students who are visually impaired and students who are print-disabled receive their textbooks and core instructional materials in specialized formats at the same time as their non-disabled peers.
The 2006 regulations implementing the 2004 IDEA include directions on how states and local districts are to respond to this legislation. The two sections of this legislation establish the National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standards (NIMAS) and the National Instructional Materials Accessibility Center (NIMAC). Providing accessible formats in a timely manner is not a new requirement. The new NIMAS process will improve this process for the students covered under these regulations.
The NIMAS standards are to be used by textbook publishers to prepare electronic files of textbooks, which can be converted to specialized formats. Specialized formats means Braille, audio, large print, text to speech or digital text, which can be used by students who are blind, have a visual disability, physically disabled and/or reading disabled. The NIMAC’s duties are to receive and maintain a catalog of these electronic files. Publishers, at the direction of local school districts, send these specially formatted files to NIMAC. When a student in a local school district requires one of these specialized formats to have access to the general education curriculum, the local district will contact an Authorized User (AU) designated by the state of Minnesota to search the NIMAC for the particular textbook and associated materials. The Authorized User can access the electronic file and convert it into the specialized format requested or identify an Accessible Media Producer (AMP) to convert the file into the specialized format. Once the specialized format has been converted, the AMP will send it to the local district making the initial request.
Minnesota has named five authorized users. They are Joan Breslin Larson firstname.lastname@example.org; Kursten Dubbels Kursten.email@example.com (both work at MDE), Donna Marhoun at the Communication Center at State Services for the Blind firstname.lastname@example.org, Bookshare and Learning Ally.
Many students can benefit from instructional materials in a range of formats, including audio, digital, standard print, large print, hard copy or digital braille. Districts are encouraged to purchase curricular materials for all students that are accessible. There are, however, some students for whom accessible instructional materials (AIM) are required because of a disabling condition. Individualized Education Program (IEP) or 504 teams can identify students who need AIM. Materials in an accessible format are available from a range of sources.
For students who have an IEP and a documented print disability, one source for AIM is the National Instructional Materials Access Center (NIMAC). Districts direct a publisher to submit a specially formatted file to the NIMAC when they purchase curricular materials. An authorized user (AU) assigns a file from the NIMAC to an accessible media producer, who converts the files to the appropriate format for a specific student. Districts would be wise to direct a publisher to submit files to the NIMAC, even if they are not aware of a student who needs AIM.
For students who do not meet the dual criteria of having an IEP and having a print disability but still need AIM, districts can work with a publisher to obtain a usable file. There are AMPs who can produce materials that are not developed from files from the NIMAC. There are also libraries of material, including public domain libraries of digital materials which can be provided to students.
Students who qualify for textbooks from the NIMAC are only those students with IEPs who are identified as blind/visually impaired or have a physical or reading disability, and who can benefit from text materials which are identical to content used by classroom peers.
Persons whose visual acuity, as determined by competent authority, is 20/200 or less in the better eye with corrective lenses, or whose widest diameter of visual field subtends an angular distance no greater than 20 degrees.
Persons whose visual disability, with correction and regardless of optical measurement, is certified by competent authority as preventing the reading of standard printed material.
Persons certified by competent authority as unable to read or unable to use standard printed material as a result of physical limitations.
Persons certified by competent authority as having a reading disability resulting from organic dysfunction and of sufficient severity to prevent their reading printed material in a normal manner. Competent authority must be a doctor of medicine, who may consult with practitioners in other disciplines. Persons with reading disabilities that do not have physical origins, regardless of severity, are not covered. Nonorganic factors –such as emotional or environmental causes, intellectual or educational deficiencies, or other possible nonorganic or nonphysical causes –must be ruled out and not taken into consideration. The following diagnoses or disorders do not create automatic eligibility: learning disabilities, dyslexia, attention deficit disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, chronic-fatigue syndrome, autism, functional illiteracy, or cognitive disability.
In cases of blindness, visual impairment, or physical disability, certifying authorities include doctors of medicine or osteopathy, ophthalmologists, optometrists, registered nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, therapists, professional staff of hospitals, institutions, and public agencies (such as school support and related service personnel, teachers of the visually impaired, social workers, counselors or rehabilitation teachers). In the absence of any of these, certification may be made by professional librarians or by any person whose competence under special circumstances is acceptable to the Library of Congress. In the case of a reading disability from an organic dysfunction, the certifying authority must be a doctor of medicine or osteopathy, who may consult with colleagues in associated disciplines. A family member is not eligible to be the certifying authority.
1. Textbook adoption guidance – textbooks published after July 19, 2006:
For adoption of elementary and secondary textbooks and core related materials, the district must require the publisher to prepare and, on or before delivery of the print instructional materials, provide to NIMAC electronic files containing the content of the print instructional materials using the NIMAS or purchase instructional materials from the publisher that are produced in, or may be rendered in, specialized formats. If the district has purchased new textbooks on or after July 19, 2006, these districts should contact the publisher and request that the textbook files are sent to NIMAC in order to comply with the NIMAS regulations.
2. Suggested language for textbook adoption contracts and Local Education Authority (LEA) purchase orders (LEAs are free to modify this to suit their needs):
By agreeing to deliver the materials marked with "NIMAS" on this contract or purchase order, the publisher agrees to prepare and submit, on or before ___/___/_____ a NIMAS file set to the NIMAC that complies with the terms and procedures set forth by the National Instructional Materials Access Center (NIMAC), (IDEA Title I, Part D, sec. 674(e)). The publisher also agrees to mark up materials eligible for NIMAS submission that contain mathematical and scientific instructional content by using the MathML3 (refer to latest applicable version) module of the DAISY/NIMAS Structure Guidelines as posted and maintained at the DAISY Consortium web site (http://www.daisy.org/z3986/structure/SG-DAISY3/index.html). Should the vendor be a distributor of the materials and not the publisher, the distributor agrees to notify the publisher immediately of its obligation to submit NIMAS filesets of the purchased products to the NIMAC. The files will be used for the production of alternate formats as permitted under the law for students with print disabilities (IDEA Title I, Part B, sec. 612(a)).
This is page __ of __ of this contract or purchase order.
In keeping with existing practice, some state and local education agencies may meet NIMAS-related requirements contained in IDEA by contracting with curriculum publishers directly to purchase accessible, student-ready versions. Some have referred to this approach as the "market model" and expect that at some point accessible instructional materials will be ordered directly from publishers at the same time as print textbooks are ordered.
3. Identifying eligible students:
• Follow all Local Education Authority (LEA) special education eligibility standards and child find/evaluation procedures, including the policies and procedures for paying for a medical diagnosis.
• Follow competent authority guidance.
• Identify eligibility on the IEP form.
4. Identifying accessible formats:
• Use appropriate assessments such as the Learning Media Assessment given by the Teachers of the Visually Impaired.
• Teachers of the Visually Impaired, Assistive Technology Consultants, and others with specific information must be involved and present at IEP meetings. If they cannot be present, their reports need to be available to IEP team members.
• Describe textbooks and related core materials to be converted to accessible formats on the IEP form. If an assessment to determine the accessible format has been completed, results should be reported also.
5. Timely manner process:
• Definition: “timely manner” language has been interpreted by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) as “at the same time as other children receive instructional materials.” The regulation requires the department to “ensure that all public agencies take all reasonable steps to provide instructional materials in accessible formats to children with disabilities who need those instructional materials at the same time as other children receive instructional materials.”[34 C.F.R. § 300.172(b)(4). OSEP’s commentary lists the following examples of reasonable steps:
• “Reasonable steps, for example, would include requiring publishers or other contractors to provide instructional materials in accessible formats by the beginning of the school year for children whom the public agency has reason to believe will be attending its schools. Reasonable steps also might include having a means of acquiring instructional materials in accessible formats as quickly as possible for children who might transfer into the public agency in the middle of the year. Reasonable steps would not include withholding instructional materials from other children until instructional materials in accessible formats are available.”
6. Considering the need for accessible instructional materials in the IEP:
• It is recommended that the IEP include a query such as the following:
“Does the student require accessible, alternate-format versions of printed textbooks and printed core materials that are written and published primarily for use in elementary and secondary school instruction and are required by an SEA or Local Education Authority (LEA) for use by students in the classroom?”
A query of this kind is designed to prompt the IEP team to consider each print-disabled student’s need for accessible, alternate-format versions of print instructional materials.
• If a student with print disability does need a specialized format, the IEP should specify the following:
7. Process for obtaining accessible formats in a timely manner:
• IEP teams make the determination of need using competent authorities as defined in IDEA. A resource for this determination include the AIM Navigator, available from the AIM Center. Team members also make the decision about need and type of accessible format required by an individual student. A resource for this is the AIM Explorer, also available from the AIM Center.
• The Local Education Authority (LEA) representative on the IEP team will assume responsibility for following district procedure for obtaining accessible formats. This might include having a specific district person designated as a Digital Right Manager (DRM). The contact between the Local Education Authority (LEA) representative and the DRM can be identified on the IEP services page as a linkage that needs to occur in a timely manner so all textbooks and related core materials can be ordered in the accessible format required by students in a timely manner.
• The DRM will contact an Authorized User to identify textbooks and related core materials needed, the type of accessible format required, and to indicate any preference in the Accessible Media Producers (AMP) who will generate the accessible materials.
8. Students who do not qualify for files from the NIMAC:
• LEAs have an obligation under IDEA to provide accessible instructional materials in a timely manner to all students who require them, including students who do not qualify for file sets from the NIMAC.
For additional information, contact Joan Breslin Larson, Minnesota Department of Education, 651-582-1599 or email@example.com